An entrance exam, then an interview. The GAMSAT if you are a graduate, the UCAT if you are not. One asks you to reason under a clock, the other to speak under one. Neither rewards what you know, and neither can be practised by reading.
You are a medical student on placement in a busy general practice clinic. During the day, you observe a consultation involving a well-known member of your local community. Later that evening, a close friend messages you and asks whether this person attended the clinic because they have heard rumours about their health.
A real station, running its real timer.
1,190
MMI stations
840
GAMSAT questions
400
UCAT questions
8
Scored competencies
The whole path, in one place.
You sit an entrance exam in the first half of the year and you are interviewed in the second. Most people prepare for those with two different products, two logins and no sense of whether they are actually ready.
Nothing in the UCAT is hard on its own. Thirty seconds a question is what makes it hard, and that is the one thing you cannot rehearse by reading an explanation.
All four subtests
Verbal, Decision Making, Quantitative and Situational Judgement, at VCE-level difficulty. Abstract Reasoning was dropped from the exam in 2025, so it is not here either.
The real clock
Every set runs at the exam's own pace, down to the second per question, and the clock cannot be paused. The on-screen calculator is as slow as the one you will be given.
Ranked against the real cohort
An estimated 300 to 900 per cognitive subtest, with the percentile it would have placed you at among the 16,950 candidates who sat the 2025 test. Situational Judgement is banded separately, as the real report does.
Almost every question hands you the information. What it takes from you is the clarity to reason with it under time.
Sections I and III
Stimulus-based practice with the passage kept beside the question. Every answer is explained option by option, and your accuracy is broken down by reasoning skill - so you know what to go and fix.
Section II, marked
A rotating pair of tasks every three days, marked against 5 criteria with an estimated band - plus unlimited unmarked prompts to write against whenever you like.
GEMSAS likelihood
Where your GPA and GAMSAT sit against applicants who reported offers, and against those who reported rejections, at every university with the data to say so. It tells you when the sample is too thin to trust.
You know the theory. What you have not done is answer an ethics question in sixty seconds, out loud, cold, with the question taken off the wall.
All three formats
Rapid, Extended and Panel, each on its real timing - Melbourne's four sub-questions, Monash's self-paced follow-ups, Flinders' 45 minutes with a panel.
An examiner who tells the truth
Your answer is recorded, transcribed and scored out of ten on each of the 8 competencies a real panel marks against. You get a verdict, the specific fixes, and one thing to practise next.
A teaching mode for tutors
Running a mock over Zoom? Share the call's audio and it records the student's answers, transcribes them, and scores them against the same rubric - kept separate from your own progress.
Nothing is scored by vibes.
Both examiners show you the per-criterion breakdown behind the number, and when there is nothing to score - a silent recording, a blank page - they say so instead of inventing one. Essays are marked against ACER’s published criteria. Interviews are scored against the competencies admissions pages say they are looking for: no school publishes its own MMI rubric, so nobody can mark you against one.